See No Evil
Hear No Evil
Marina & "Hidell"
Problems with Marina's testimony against her husband
The "Misfired" Round
Bullets in the Pocket
The WC alters timing
More evidence that Oswald was on the first floor
Evidence the "Gunsack was never on the 6th floor
Evidence the "Gunsack" was made on the afternoon of 11/22/63
Evidence the rifle was never in the "Gunsack"
Evidence the bag Oswald brought to work contained his lunch
Evidence Oswald had not fired a rifle
Evidence Oswald had not fired a handgun
Evidence the Depository rifle was not part of the February shipment to Klein's
Evidence that Oswald was at work when the money order for the rifle was purchased and the envelope mailed
Evidence that the "$ 21.45" entry on Klein's bank account statement was not the "Hidell" money order
Evidence that Oswald's handwriting was easily forgeable
Evidence the rifle in the "Backyard Photos" is not the Depository Rifle
Evidence that the Depository Rifle had not been fired on 11/22/63
Evidence that Klein's Sporting Goods did not mount the scope on the Depository Rifle
Evidence that Oswald could not afford to order the weapons
Proof the bullets recovered from Tippit's body did not match the bullets in evidence
News video shows the jacket was white
Problems with the gray jacket's chain of custody
Evidence that the witnesses described the jacket of the Tippit murderer as white
Evidence that the police radio description of the jacket found was white
Evidence that the witnesses refused to identify the gray jacket as the jacket the killer wore
Skeptical witness identification of the gray jacket as the jacket the killer wore
More problems with the evidence
Problems with the Chain of Custody of CE 573
Spectrographic evidence that CE 573 was not the same ammunition fired at JFK
Gen. Walker to HSCA: "Walker bullet" not Walker bullet
Evidence Oswald was "a rather poor shot"
Based on the general Marine Corps ratings, Lt. Col. A. G. Folsom, Jr., head, Records Branch, Personnel Department, Headquarters U.S. Marine Corps, evaluated the sharpshooter qualification as a "fairly good shot." and a low marksman rating as a "rather poor shot." ( Report, pg. 191 )
Oswald's Marine Corps shooting record, which the Commission called Anderson Exhibit 1, consisted of 3 pages. Page 1 was the introduction. Pages 2 and 3 of that document are posted below. On page 2, below left, the reader can see that although Oswald fired a score of 212 and qualified as a "sharpshooter" on December 21, 1956, he was on the course for a total of two weeks before achieving that score. ( blue circle )
Oswald does not qualify with a rifle again until two and a half years later.
Major ANDERSON. The record shows that 6 May 1959 he fired the B course.
Mr. SPECTER. And what weapon was used at that time?
Major ANDERSON. The M-1 rifle.
Mr. SPECTER. And what score was obtained on that occasion?
Major ANDERSON. 191 for marksman.
( 11 H 304 )
The Commission's own record indicates that on May 6, 1959, Oswald fired a score of 191 on firing course "B" and obtained a qualification as "marksman". The record also indicates that the minimum score to qualify was 190. ( above red boxes ) The record further shows that the Marine Corps considered that "a low marksman qualification indicates a rather poor shot."
With a minimum score of 190 to qualify, is there anyone on this planet who believes that a score of 191 is anything more than a "low marksman qualification" ?
Apparently, Maj. Anderson did:
Mr. SPECTER. Based on what you see of Mr. Oswald's marksmanship capabilities from the Marine Corps records which you have before you, Major Anderson, how would you characterize him as a marksman?
Major ANDERSON. I would say that as compared to other Marines receiving the same type of training, that Oswald was a good shot, somewhat better than or equal to--better than the average let us say. As compared to a civilian who had not received this intensive training, he would be considered as a good to excellent shot.
( 11 H 305 )
That doesn't say much for the rest of the Marine Corps back then.
The Anderson 1 Exhibit was written by Lt. Col. Allison G. Folsom. Col. Folsom was called to give testimony, but Commission counsel never asked him a single question about Oswald's 191 score. Counsel's interest in the May 1959 rifle test was limited to questions about the course:
Mr. ELY. .....Under the column "Course" we see that at one point he fired the M-1 Rifle on a so-called "A" course, and, too, he fired it on a "B" course. Could you tell us what the difference is between those two courses?
( 8 H 306 )
Mr. ELY. Am I correct in stating that the "B" course firing to which you referred occurred on May 6, 1959, at El Toro, Calif.?
( 8 H 307 )
That's it. That ended the Commission's interest in Oswald's May, 1959 rifle qualification.
More evidence that Oswald couldn't shoot comes from witness Nelson Delgado, who served in the Marine Corps with Oswald. he testified about Oswald's performance with a rifle on the shooting range:
Mr. LIEBELER. Did you fire with Oswald?
Mr. DELGADO. Right; I was in the same line. By that I mean we were on line together, the same time, but not firing at the same position, but at the same time, and I remember seeing his. It was a pretty big joke, because he got a lot of "Maggie's drawers," you know, a lot of misses, but he didn't give a darn.
Mr. LIEBELER. Missed the target completely?
Mr. DELGADO. He just qualified, that's it.
( 8 H 235 )
Delgado gave a video interview with author Mark Lane in 1966 ( which can be seen here ) in which he describes Oswald's lack of shooting skills and claims that the FBI tried to get him to say on the record that Oswald was a good shot.